NEW YORK – On September 11th, I visited Ground Zero and stood there in a driving rain while the names of the 3,000 innocent victims were read by the bereaved families and cops and firemen.
Eight years.
And, as I wrote in my column that day for GlobalPost, there are hard questions that linger: how is it possible that we have not completed the construction of a 9-11 monument, what have we accomplished in Afghanistan and how did we go so far astray in Iraq?
It was a somber moment to reflect on eight years of reporting in Afghanistan and Iraq and in the London bombings and the Madrid bombings and the seemingly endless struggle that came to be called “The Long War” during the Bush administration and that these days seems to have no name at all. Check out two interviews I did about the anniversary of September 11 on John Hockenberry’s The Takeaway, the kick-ass, morning radio show produced by Public Radio International out of WNYC in New York, and on our editorial partner WorldFocus, produced out of WNET in New York and aired on PBS television stations.
I was thinking about all the datelines form which I had filed on this long, struggle against terrorism. And about one place in particular, Ganjgal, Afghanistan, where four US Marines were killed last week in an ambush. McClatchy Newspapers correspondent, Jonathan S. Landay, an excellent combat reporter, was embedded with the unit that entered the village in the Sarkani district and walked into the ambush. Landay’s harrowing account is must reading to understand just how bad things are over there.
But I have some unique background on Ganjgal, a village in Kunar Province. I was there for The Boston Globe on the fifth anniversary of 9-11 and it provided the centerpiece of a special report — with video, audio, written dispatches and excellent photography by VII’s Gary Knight — on the perils of the US’ “forgotten war” in Afghanistan. (That report was in many ways a precursor of the GlobalPost special report “Life, Death and the Taliban.”) In 2006 , I wrote about how insurgents fired rockets down on the Forward Operation Base that is adjacent to the village. The attack shook us and we awoke to US and Afghan forces returning fire into the darkness at an unseen enemy. The local US commander was surprised by the attack because the village was considered sympathetic to the Americans set up in the FOB next door. In fact, in the trite shorthand that goes with war, the commander called them “our friendlies.”
Back then, I reported how, after meeting with village elders from Ganjgal in the following days, we learned that the village elders had allowed Pakistani militants to set up the attack because the village was angry that several of its elders had been captured and detained and were being held in Bagram on no charges. There were allegations of torture and brutal treatment. There was a mistrust brewing between the village and the FOB
and you could feel it taking shape back then. Now, it is my understanding, that several of those village elders have never been released from Bagram and now there is an open hostility between Ganjgal and the nearby FOB. In every village in Afghanistan where insurgents are engaged in battle against the US and the coalition, there is a back story like this one. The only way the US will ever be effective in Afghanistan is for its troops to know these back stories, to understand where the hostility of that village comes from. And then, to have the courage and the wisdom to examine whether in fact its village elders were wrongly accused and unlawfully detained. And if they establish that is the case, they should work hard to correct the error and secure the men’s release. That will go a very long way in turning that village around to become what General Petraeus calls, “reconcilables,” or what the local commander called, “our friendlies.”









GroundTruth is written by Charles Sennott, the Executive Editor and co-founder of GlobalPost. The blog is a way for GlobalPost to let you know what our correspondents all over the world are covering every day. It is a place where Sennott highlights the best work in the field by a stellar team of correspondents . 